include ("includes/analytics.htm") ?>
ERS 60 Problem
Set 3 Problem 1 Other than light and water, nitrogen is often the
most limiting nutrient for plant growth in many ecosystems. A simplified model of N cycling in two
forested ecosystems (from Young and Giese, 1990) is shown in the compartment
model on the next page (four compartments: vegetation, forest floor, mineral
soil, and available). Ecosystem (a)
is a deciduous forest in the northeastern US; ecosystem (b) is a coniferous
forest in the northwestern US. Values
next to arrows are transfers between compartments each year (kg/ha/yr);
values in boxes are amounts of stored N (kg/ha); values in parentheses are
changes in stored N each year (kg/ha/yr).
One way to calculate the rate at which N is cycled or transferred
between different parts of the ecosystem is to divide the sum of transfers
into the compartment by the mass of N in the compartment. The result is a turnover rate (or rate
constant) with units of yr‑1 (per year) for each
compartment. EXAMPLE: Deciduous forest mineral soil 12.2 kg/ha/yr 3400 kg/ha = 0.0036/yr This means 0.36% of the N in the mineral soil of the deciduous forest is turned over each year. Put another way, it would take about 278 years (i.e., 1/0.0036) for complete turnover of the N in the mineral soil (this is referred to as the mean residence time). Calculate
the rate constants and mean residence times for the remaining compartments in
both forests and show your results in
a table. Which step
is the rate-limiting step (i.e., the slowest rate, the one that determines
the overall rate) for the N cycle in each forest? Which is the fastest step? Explain why
the input of N by precipitation is so much greater in the deciduous forest. Based on the
values shown for the two forests, is there a net gain, a net loss, or
a steady state amount of N in the
two ecosystems? EXPLAIN. |
Problem
2 In
contrast to ecosystems that are not harvested, wherein nutrient cycling is
generally quite conservative, most agricultural ecosystems are net exporters
of nutrients inherent in soil.
Consider the following barley production system: -- Soil contains 0.5% “available” Ca in
the rooting zone to a depth of 50 cm. -- Soil bulk density is 1.25 g/cm3. -- Total plant production (biomass) is
5500 kg/ha/yr (dry-weight basis). -- Total grain yield is 2700 kg/ha/yr
(dry-weight basis). -- Ca content of the grain is 0.05%. -- Ca content of the whole plant is
1.4%. 1
ha = 10,000 m2 If only the grain is
removed from the field, how many years will the “available” Ca supply in the
soil last (assuming yields don’t decrease as Ca content decreases)? If the entire barley plant
is removed, how long will the Ca last (same assumption as above)? What sources of Ca, other
than the addition of fertilizer, could contribute to the Ca nutrition of the
barley? |